More Complete Bullshit About Vaccines and Autism

So this lovely image popped up on my Facebook wall today.

Now, this is me.  I can't resist sometimes.  So I just had to respond.  It's probably much blunter than it should be.  A politician wouldn't use words like bullshit.  They would say "In due respect to the right honorable gentleman, he is perhaps misinformed."  Because in politics you're not meant so say "You're talking crap mate, and here's why."  But I'm not a politician.  I'm just a normal autistic person.  And stereotypically, we are not noted for our tact!

There's a ton of information about this subject online, sound information.  I really should read a lot more of it and get it all in my head so I don't have to look anything up.  I should read all of my books on autism too.  I received my first book on the subject just a year ago, an early birthday present from a friend who thought it would be good for me in exploring my own self.  It was.  The book was "Nerdy, Shy, and Socially Inappropriate" by Cynthia Kim.  Her blog, which is no longer updated, is Musings of an Aspie, contains loads of good material.  I recommend it highly for those who want to know more about autism or are looking into the possibility of diagnosis or what to do with a diagnosis.  Now I have very nearly a shelf of books on the subject.

So.  My tactless response.

This is bullshit.

Please give details of ALL cases where the US government has compensated people for "vaccine induced autism" since 1986.

Can't do that? Okay then. Give me just TWO cases. Just two.

Wow. You can't do that either?

That's because it's bullshit. And there are not two cases to be found.

There was ONE case, just one, in which there was compensation for "autism like symptoms" but that child was later diagnosed with something else that caused the symptoms, a mitochondrial enzyme deficit. (damages awarded to the family of Hannah Poling in 2008)

The previous year saw the start of the omnibus autism proceedings. The claimants, the family of Michelle Cedillo, went to court after being convinced by ex-doctor Andrew Wakefield that MMR caused their child's autism and through a "Defeat Autism Now!" conference. The judgement ruled that the evidence was overwhelmingly to the contrary and that they had been misled by medical professionals.

In fact, a total of zero autistic people or the their families have been compensated for so called "vaccine induced autism."

Zero.

Yes, zero.

Now can you please stop sharing this total garbage.

I await a reply.

To read more about autism omnibus proceeding, look here, a clearly written web page.  It even has a link to a complete transcript of the trial if you have a lot of time and obsessive interest to spare.  For a scientific, medical view on the Hannah Poling case, there's this.  Then there's this, an article published a few days ago, on the lack of a link between MMR and autism as proved in a study involving 95,000 children.  And for reading on ex-doctor Andrew Wakefield's article that claimed a link between vaccines and autism, you could do worse than this from the BMJ.  To summarise: the article was fraudulent.  Not a surprise.  Wakefield has been called the "father of the anti-vaccine movement."  As such I believe he has a lot to answer for.

People still want to believe even though the evidence is very clear.  This site for instance has nearly 400 articles about Andrew Wakefield.  They say autism is man-made, environmental and can be cured.  They still believe that vaccines cause it.  And yes, they're very into "Autism Awareness Day" too, a day that needs eradicating because we need "Autism Acceptance Day" and then "Autism Celebration Day".

It's understandable people want to find a simple cause for autism.  And it's understandable too when people want to seek a cure for their child.  Because, there's no doubting it, autism is bloody hard work for parents.  It is.  And without decent support it can be easy to despair or look for ways out.  Unfortunately often that support is not available and parents are left to deal with everything themselves.  They love their children and give them everything they can but the honest truth is that it's exhausting.  Without proper education and support and celebration of their child by society it's only natural that parents might want a way out.  Chapter two of Neurotribes, by Steve Silberman gives an account of such a family and all the things they tried - and the reasons why - and how they came to embrace and celebrate their autistic child and how they feel about all the things they tried that damaged their child, including their own involvement with "Defeat Autism Now!".  It's sobering reading but such parents deserve much compassion at all stages of the journey.  These are good people, trying their best.

The Measles Vaccine: I Am Told It Is A Terrible Thing

Scrolling down my facebook feed this morning I found this image and a link to an article on vaccination deaths.

On the face of it that's a terrible pair of statistics.  On the face of it, with just those numbers, anyone would be up in arms and call for the banning of measles vaccines.  With just those numbers, nobody would call for a return to the almost universal measles vaccination program in the USA in the 1990s.  Everyone would applaud those who stand against the pressure to vaccinate their children.

And of course the site on which the image is found must be a trustworthy medical site - after all the writer of the article and editor of the site has a BA in Bible and Greek so you know he knows a great deal about medicine!  As he writes in his testimonial, "Any health product, medicine, or natural cures are worthless if you don't know God and His incredible love for you, and understand His will for your life." With words like that you know you're utterly safe listening to whatever he says about medicine.  Perhaps that's enough sarcasm for today.

But of course there is another face.  Another side to those frightening statistics.  Those numbers do not tell the whole story.  As it turns out they don't tell the story at all.

Yes, I believe measles vaccinations work.  I believe they are a very good thing indeed. If you look at the number of deaths and hospitalizations due to measles before the introduction of the vaccines it becomes bloody obvious.  Excuse my language!

In the period before vaccinations were introduced there were 3 to 4 million cases of measles in the US every year resulting in 48,000 hospital stays, 400-500 deaths and 4000 cases of encephalitis.  This was a drop from 5,300 deaths a year a few decades earlier, simply because there was far, far better medical care in hospitals in the 1950s than in the 1910s.

So without vaccines and with medical care there would have been probably nearly half a million people in hospital for measles in the past ten years and probably 4,500 deaths and 40,000 cases of encephalitis. Taking the "facts" I was given this morning at face value, measles vaccination has cut the death rate massively.  And it is alleviated a stupendous amount of suffering.

But let's check the quoted "facts" from the above graphic.

"Fact" One - The "Zero". By 2000, measles had been pretty much eliminated in the US due to vaccinations. The CDC website states, "In 2000, the United States declared that measles was eliminated from this country. The United States was able to eliminate measles because it has a highly effective measles vaccine, a strong vaccination program that achieves high vaccine coverage in children and a strong public health system for detecting and responding to measles cases and outbreaks."  That CDC page is worth a quick read if you have any interest at all in vaccinations or measles - even if, like me, you are not from the USA.

With the lessening use of vaccinations it has returned and is slowly increasing. "Slowly" is what would be expected. You wouldn't expect many deaths from a disease that had almost been wiped out in the nation. Nevertheless, there have been deaths in the US. The above statistic of zero claims to be sourced from the CDC but I could give you direct links to the CDC site that prove the claim to be false. There haven't been many deaths, and that's to be expected, but those deaths exclude other side effects that measles has produced - brain damage, deafness, pneumonia and so on.

"Fact" Two - the 108. This claims to be drawn from VAERS. But VAERS cannot tell you anything about whether a vaccine caused a reaction. It does not track specific adverse reactions to vaccines. Hence such a statistic cannot possibly be drawn from VAERS in any sensible manner. Yes, at some point after being vaccinated against measles 108 people died. But to state categorically that this is because the vaccines caused the deaths is to completely reinterpret the data.

For more information on the problems associated with applying definite causation to the VAERS cases, I'd recommend this rather sensible blog page written be people who devote much time to applying science and sense to the claims of the anti-vaccination campaigners.  Lots of people with far more knowledge than me have written sensible pages online about vaccinations.  Why are you reading me instead of reading those pages?!  Trust those people, not me.  Because just like the author of the article that got me writing, I don't have a medical degree - just two theology degrees.

To conclude, as Newsweek states in this article,  "Those promoting this 108 number appear to be uninterested in widely accepted facts, and most don’t seem to understand the difference between correlation and causation. Or they just don’t care. Their primary interest, it seems, is in waging a PR war against the likes of the CDC. And if they win that battle, it could be a public health disaster for all of us."